- The big corporate has more than 40% stake in a joint venture company in a foreign country.
- Some directors served in the board of this joint venture company.
- The board was advised that there was an issue with the contamination in the product on early August and a trade recall begun on the same day.
- Yet, the public recall only occur almost one month later.
- During the process someone got sick consuming the product.
- The plot thickens...someone died as a result.
- When asked why the company did not act sooner, the answers given were:-
- it would have been irresponsible for not to have followed the guidelines of the local authorities
- it would be irresponsible not to have followed the rules of an individual market place
- they are a minority shareholder in that joint venture (even though it has more than 40% stake)
- their efforts to push for product recall were blocked by the foreign government officials
- The head of the state then chipped in and claimed to be whistle blower.
- Now the head of the company proclaimed loudly: "Someone sabotaged our product!" (even though he has no concrete proof yet)
Monday, September 15, 2008
How to create plots for an industry sabotage thriller...
If you are following the NZ news lately, you would come across the news about the food contamination scandal involving a large company. The chain of events that unfolded will make a very good plot for a suspense thriller:-
No comments:
Post a Comment